Silvergate Capital recently settled with the SEC for $50 million following allegations of misleading investors about the strength of its BSA/AML compliance program. The SEC claimed that Silvergate Capital, its subsidiary Silvergate Bank, and two executives provided false assurances regarding the monitoring of crypto customers, including the exchange FTX. The company’s automated monitoring system reportedly failed to oversee over $1 trillion of customer transactions on the Silvergate Exchange Network (SEN). The alleged wrongdoing occurred between November 2022 and January 2023.
As part of the settlement, the SEC imposed a $1 million civil penalty on former Silvergate CEO Alan Lane, a $250,000 civil penalty on former Silvergate Chief Risk Officer Kathleen Fraher, and permanent injunctions on the companies and executives involved. Additionally, Lane and Fraher agreed to five-year officer-and-director bars. It is essential to note that all parties settled without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, and the settlements are pending court approval.
In addition to the SEC’s allegations, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors and the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) have announced parallel actions against Silvergate Capital. The regulators are demanding $63 million in fines, which Silvergate can offset against the $50 million owed to the SEC. These parallel actions do not explicitly reference Silvergate’s connection with FTX but focus on the company’s handling of crypto assets and monitoring shortcomings.
The settlement and regulatory actions against Silvergate Capital highlight the importance of transparency and adherence to compliance regulations in the financial industry, particularly concerning cryptocurrency transactions. The case serves as a stern reminder for companies to prioritize regulatory compliance and proper monitoring systems to prevent fraudulent activities and protect investors’ interests.
Overall, the settlement of Silvergate Capital with the SEC and the subsequent regulatory actions underscore the repercussions of failing to uphold regulatory standards in the financial sector. It emphasizes the need for companies to maintain robust compliance programs and effective monitoring mechanisms to safeguard against illicit activities and maintain the trust of stakeholders. As the case unfolds, it will undoubtedly influence the regulatory landscape and shape industry practices moving forward.
Leave a Reply